[Bug 5653] Final vocabulary clean-up

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5653


John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|hasProposal, needsAgreement |editorial




--- Comment #3 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>  2008-06-24 15:40:10 ---
F2F consensus on proposal in comment 2

- item 1: accepted
- item 2: revised to remove "by a conforming schema-aware processor" so it
reads

In each instance document in the model, the [validity] property of the root
element and all of its attributes and descendants MUST NOT be "invalid" when
schema validity is assessed by a conforming schema-aware processor with respect
to the referenced XML Schema documents in the model's definition documents.
[XML Schema Structures]

- item 3: revised to

SML-IF Producer 
   A SML-IF Producer is a program that generates a SML-IF Document from a SML
model.

SML-IF Consumer 
   A SML-IF Consumer is a program that processes a SML-IF Document using, in
whole or part, semantics defined by this specification.  It may or may not
perform
interchange set validation.

- item 4: revised to

The editors to search for unqualified "consumer" uses that readers
would find ambiguous.  There are at least a few unqualified uses in normative
sections of the current editor's draft.

- item 5: (SMLIF 4.4 item 1) accepted as proposed

- item 6: revised during meeting with a concrete proposal, namely:

When performing interchange model validation over the SML model packaged in an
SML-IF instance, an SML-IF consumer must draw associations between XML Schema
definition documents and
instance documents, both to completely validate XML Schema
documents themselves and to establish the schema-validity of the instance
documents.

No need for further wg review expressed.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 15:40:45 UTC