Your comments on SML LC

Hi Henry
The SML WG has resolved several bugs that were opened based on your comments.  Please review the resolutions of these bugs and record your approval/disapproval in the bugs. The SML WG will be in Edinburgh for the next few days, and we would love to have an in-person meeting with you to discuss the resolutions of the bugs that were opened based on your comments - especially where you are still not satisfied with our resolution. John and  MSM will be happy to schedule this meeting based on your convenience.

Here's the list of relevant bugs

5522<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5522>

RESO

FIXE

decided, externalComments

The term "containing element" is not clear

5541<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5541>

RESO

FIXE

decided, externalComments

Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?

5513<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5513>

RESO

INVA

externalComments

Why does SML define sml:ref instead of using XLink

5524<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5524>

RESO

INVA

externalComments

Rename section 4.4.1.1

5529<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5529>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments

Clarify Appendix C

5545<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5545>

RESO

WORK

externalComments

Reconcile SML URIs with RFC3986

5520<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5520>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments, resolved

Why is document defined as a character sequence?

5523<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5523>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments, resolved

Discuss the behavior of GET on URI

5525<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5525>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments, resolved

Confusing section names

5526<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5526>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments, resolved

What does "nested to any depth" mean?

5528<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5528>

RESO

FIXE

externalComments, resolved

xs:import for SML namespace is unnecessary




Thanks!
Pratul

Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 15:50:56 UTC