http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5636 --- Comment #5 from John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com> 2008-06-23 11:48:52 --- Prong 1 change 1: REJECTED Prong 1 change 2: Desire to define what embed means, but not as children since we are talking about schema properties here. from: sch:schema elements MAY be embedded in members of the {application information} of the .. to: sch:schema elements MAY appear as items in the {application information} of the ... Prong 1 change 3: dup of prong 2 change 2 Prong 1 change 4 (first one): REJECTED, otherwise it would not covers P1e Prong 1 change 4 (second one): REJECTED as harmless & potentially confusing Prong 1 change 5 (first one): NO CHANGE, since covering p1e is desired Prong 1 change 5 (second one): REJECTED, so p1e is covered Prong 1 change 6: REJECTED, harmless but unnecessary Prong 1 change 7: REJECTED, unnecessary due to other changes rejected above Prong 1 change 8: REJECTED MSM proposal: Add to 6.3.1 Mapping from schema, paragraph 3: For other schema components, local-rules is empty. MSM proposal is ACCEPTED. The wg members ARE aware that the MSM proposal = prong 1 change 3 = prong 2 change 4, we simply read 2/2 incorrectly the first time around. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 11:49:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 June 2008 11:49:27 GMT