- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:53:59 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- Comment #7 from Pratul Dublish <pratul.dublish@microsoft.com> 2008-07-17 19:53:59 --- 7/17 call - summary of discussion for record ONLY. The WG appears to be leaning towards the following but this has NOT been formally approved as yet because a) not all xml processors are *required* to expose DTD IDness, and b) schema IDs may or may not be recognized depending on whether you actually do schema validation.04 01the best we can do is probably to allow bare name, but makes its behavior impl-defined. <Sandy> Pratul: what does impl-defined mean? can a processor just always return null? <Sandy> Sandy: a little stronger. the feature is required and processors are expected to try their best to resolve it. e.g. if schema validation was performed, then schema ids should be recognized. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:54:33 UTC