- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:29:42 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5382 kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Keywords|editorial |needsReview Resolution| |FIXED ------- Comment #2 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2008-01-18 09:29 ------- The sentence "This proposal..." was odd given the surrounding context. The following change was made to fix this. From: So it is clear that SML-IF cannot guarantee general case interoperability based only on XML Schema given the constraints above and, therefore, needs to specify how to determine such associations. This proposal concerns only SML model validation and not SML-IF validation (against the IF schema). Unless otherwise indicated, "validation" or "validity" in the following sections refers to SML model validation. To: So it is clear that SML-IF cannot guarantee general case interoperability based only on XML Schema given the constraints above and, therefore, needs to specify how to determine such associations. This section describes a method to achieve this goal.
Received on Friday, 18 January 2008 09:32:56 UTC