W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > February 2008

[Bug 5416] clarify sml ref constraint info and table 4-2 contents

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 05:07:18 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1JLX4Y-0007aI-CS@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5416


kumarp@microsoft.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|editorial                   |needsReview




------- Comment #5 from kumarp@microsoft.com  2008-02-03 05:07 -------
[1]
Did not modify table 4-2.

[2]
Added the following text below the table:

Note that, 

1. if an element instance is not an SML reference, then the validity rules are
considered trivially satisfied for that instance in that there is no element
that would invalidate the rules. 

2. "Check" in the table above means that the appropriate constraint must be
evaluated. 


[3]
I checked the acyclic constraint section. It has similar writing style and the
same structure as the target* constraints (i.e., Mapping from Schema/Schema
Validity Rules/Instance Validity Rules). I am not sure how it is written quite
differently as mentioned in the 1/31 minutes. If a change to the acyclic
section is desired, some clarification will help the editors. I have not
changed anything in that section at this time.
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2008 05:07:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:09 UTC