RE: proposed fix for 5741

Ginny/Kumar,

Thanks for drawing my attention to this issue. :-)

Still thinking about 2.c.iii... But I have a minor comment on another 
bullet.

In bug 5543, I suggested to make use of the variable "D" in bullet 2.c.i. 
We decided to deal with that later (and John opened this as a separate 
issue in 5980 [2]).

5980 only covers 2.c.i, but I think a similar comment applies to 2.c.ii.

We can certainly open another bug to track this, but given that we are 
touching the words already, maybe it's simpler (process-wise) to include 
the following change.

"A. If a target <add>T</add> can be identified <add>in D</add> based on 
XML-Schema-determined ID<add> by the Shorthand Pointer</add>, then the 
reference target is <del>the the element identified based on the 
XML-Schema-determined ID by the Shorthand Pointer</del><add>T</add>.
B. If a target cannot be identified <add>in D</add> based on 
XML-Schema-determined ID, then it is implementation-defined whether the 
reference target is identified based on other criteria allowed for 
Shorthand Pointers<add>, provided that the target, if any, MUST be in 
D</add>."

Also note that bullet "A" has repeating "the".

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5543
[2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5980

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG
Member, W3C SML WG
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 313-3255
 



Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org
2008-08-27 01:46 AM

To
"Smith, Virginia (HP Software)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>, 
"public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
cc

Subject
RE: proposed fix for 5741






I am ok with either ?URI reference? or ?URI-reference?.
 
Sandy, do you have a comment on 2.c.iii ?
 
 
From: Smith, Virginia (HP Software) [mailto:virginia.smith@hp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 9:55 PM
To: Kumar Pandit; public-sml@w3.org
Subject: RE: proposed fix for 5741
 
I am ok as follows:
 
-          URI-reference should be ?URI reference? as in the original 
text. While it is true that the text in RFC 3986 uses ?URI-reference?, I 
think that is a result of the grammar reference. The section title is ?URI 
reference?. Looking at RFC 3987 we do not see that ?-? used in URI 
reference or IRI reference. And I don?t see the ?-? used elsewhere also. 
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier
-          I defer to Sandy on 2.c.iii (implementation variances ok?)
--
ginny
 
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On 
Behalf Of Kumar Pandit
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:57 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Cc: Kumar Pandit
Subject: proposed fix for 5741
 
Here is a diff for the proposed fix for 5741. Please take a look and let 
me know if you agree (or disagree) with it. I would like to get closure on 
it before the Thu call if possible. Thanks for your cooperation.