All, In comment #9 to issue 5431, John provided extensive comments on the draft of the EPR Note. Attached is an equally extensively revised version of the Note. Principal changes to the note: 1. More explicit recognition that the Note defines a framework for defining EPR reference schemes. 2. Consideration is given to the using the framework in a normative manner for compliance purposes. 3. The WS-ResourceFramework reference scheme is defined in much greater technical detail. This is partly done to show compliance with the Framework, but I also realized that I was taking shortcuts that I should not have been taking (such as using namespace prefixes without specifying their expected URI). 4. The discussion of how to treat EPR reference schemes in SML-IF documents is expanded. See bugzilla issue 5656 for some changes that I believe should be made to the SML-IF spec to better help definers of user-defined reference schemes to understand what is required for interoperability using such schemes. Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. CA, Inc. Research Staff Member, CA Labs Council of Technical Excellence Tele: 603 823 7146 (preferred) Cell: 603 991 8873 Fax: 603 823 7148 kirk.wilson@ca.com This e-mail may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, please delete this e-mail and notify the sender immediately.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 April 2008 13:59:32 GMT