W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > April 2008

[Bug 5298] Consider using another term for 'URI scheme'

From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:39:12 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Jmqo4-0003vU-5R@farnsworth.w3.org>


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5298





------- Comment #8 from ht@inf.ed.ac.uk  2008-04-18 13:39 -------
I am happy with the change to "SML URI Reference Scheme"

Received on Friday, 18 April 2008 13:39:51 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org: "[Bug 5530] Use consistent form for MIT URI"
Previous message: bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org: "[Bug 5527] Why is NCName optional?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 18 April 2008 13:39:52 GMT