W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > April 2008

[Bug 5541] Why is schema-less identification of reference elements important?

From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:29:59 +0000
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Jjwql-0001qw-Gp@farnsworth.w3.org>


------- Comment #6 from johnarwe@us.ibm.com  2008-04-10 13:29 -------
1. I think we need to add a <li> to SMLIF 4.5 Interoperability of SML Models as
a result of this change.  Consumers that make a different impl-defined choice
about whether or not to use PSVI are not always going to provide consistent
validation results (eg in the presence of schema-defaulted sml:ref).

2. This change also makes 4.5 Interoperability of SML Models item 1 no longer
strictly true, since two implementations might not recognize the same set of

3. "Interoperability of SML Models" (sic) seems like an odd title for a chapter
in  the SMLIF spec.  Editors' discretion given (by me, cannot speak for the
full wg); something like "Interoperability of SML Model Exchange" seems more in
keeping with SMLIF's role, and the <p> text immediately following the heading.
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:30:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:10 UTC