- From: <bugzilla@farnsworth.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:28:14 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Cc:
kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Keywords|needsAgreement |decided ------- Comment #2 from kumarp@microsoft.com 2008-03-27 19:31 ------- resolution in conf call on 3/27: The SML working group believes that there is good reason for allowing assertions on both elements and types. Our experience is that some vocabulary designers work in a type-centered way, some in an element-centered way, and many in ways spread out along the scale. Restriction of functionality to types, and not allowing it on elements, favors one style of vocabulary design over the others; we are not certain, however, that type-centered design is the only style that needs to be supported. I'm changing its status accordingly. The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. Please review the current LC text and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 13:31:48 UTC