RE: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec

I agree that we need to follow a consistent procedure.

I followed the resolved-fixed path since it tells me that I have completed work on the bug. If the WG does not agree with the fix, the bug can always be reopened (as you correctly did). However, I am ok either way. That is, marking either resolved-fixed or keep-open after editorial change that needs review.


From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sandy Gao
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:45 AM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec


I'm slightly confused by the process.

After an editor makes a change to fix a bug and the change needs to be reviewed by the WG (hence marked "needsReview"), should the bug be marked "resolved" immediately or should it be left open? Some bugs with needsReview were left open, but some others were "resolved".

I had thought that they should stay "open" until the WG reviews and approves them. I was depending on my "all open SML bugs" query and never look at resolved bugs, which obviously missed a few of them.

Some clarification would be appreciated. Also for those that are reviewed/approved by the WG, should its keyword be changed to something else so that they won't be caught by people's search criteria again?

Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG<http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema/>
Member, W3C SML WG<http://www.w3.org/XML/SML/>
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 969-3255


bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org

2007-09-14 02:19 AM

To

public-sml@w3.org

cc

Subject

[Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec








http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803


kumarp@microsoft.com changed:

          What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
        Resolution|                            |FIXED

Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 22:14:36 UTC