RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft

Is anyone else having a problem accessing the Editor's copies?  I'm
timing out when I try to open the editor's copies on the public page.

 

Is there another process for getting the latest draft copies so we can
review the changes to date?

 

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member

CA Labs

603 823-7146

 

________________________________

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Pratul Dublish
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:38 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: Its time to publish 2nd draft

 

All

We are close to our target date for publishing the second draft (which
is 9/19). The editorial team is working on updating the spec to reflect
the changes that were approved in yesterday's call and expect to have a
draft ready by Monday, 9/17.  They have already made several changes and
these are ready for review by the members.  Please review the following
changes made by the editorial team and send in  any request for changes
at the earliest and no later than 5 PM PST on 9/18

 

4630 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4630>  

Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 

4638 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4638>  

Conformance section needed 

4647 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4647>  

smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text node... 

4686 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4686>  

Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" 

4802 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4802>  

For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform t... 

4803 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803>  

Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an ins... 

4884 <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4884>  

update the definition of a null reference to include the ... 

 

 

Thanks!

Pratul

Received on Saturday, 15 September 2007 19:27:54 UTC