[Bug 4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear from bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org on 2007-09-14 (public-sml@w3.org from September 2007)

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:50:00 +0000
To: public-sml@w3.org
CC:
Message-Id: <E1IWFIm-0001xV-9I@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4807


kumarp@microsoft.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|editorial                   |needsAgreement




------- Comment #2 from kumarp@microsoft.com  2007-09-14 17:50 -------
I propose that we should remove this section entirely rather than spending time
fixing/clarifying it. There are a couple of reasons: 

1.       Support for structured xml output is optional. It will be more
productive to spend our time on core (non-optional) SML issues. If we have lot
of time left after fixing all core issues, we can discuss whether to  bring
this back. 
2.       It is strange that the SML spec even attempts to define this. This
should either be implementation dependent or should be the responsibility of
the schematron spec to define.

Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 17:50:02 UTC