W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > October 2007

[Bug 4636] What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:59:40 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Imz7c-0008Ni-Uf@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4636


virginia.smith@hp.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|virginia.smith@hp.com       |cmsmcq@w3.org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Keywords|hasProposal                 |




------- Comment #3 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-10-30 21:59 -------
Based on minutes from Redmond f2f, Oct 16, I moved this back to unassigned and
set keyword to needsAgreement only:

>From minutes:
"Created ACTION-135 - Investigate if there any implemetation issues with
supporting xpath1() scheme [on Kumar Pandit - due 2007-10-23].

Resolution: get back to this defect after Kumar and Pratul/John/MSM
investigates issues with the proposed xpath1() scheme usage"
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 21:59:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:07 UTC