http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5047 ------- Comment #7 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-26 21:45 ------- > the floating comments are not part of the embedded document. Was this a conscious decision? Are you suggesting that there is no way to package: <!-- my important comment --> <?my-important-PI?> <root/> <!-- my important comment --> <?my-important-PI?> in an SML-IF document without losing comments and PIs? I don't know whether having 3 proposals counts as "hasProposal". :-) Here they are: 1. Do not allow extension points in <data>. The embedded document is "all characters after <data> and before </data>." 2. Allow extension points in <data>. The embedded document is "all characters after <data> and before the first extension element, if any, otherwise before </data>". 3. Allow extension points in <data>. The embedded document is the element matching the "skip" wildcard (from '<' of the start tag to '>' of the matching end tag; ignoring comments and PIs). I prefer #1, because we then don't need to deal with the "how about comments/PIs" question. Also note that one of the potential resolutions to bug 4687 is to embed base64 text in <data>, which would make "extensions" look awkward.Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 21:45:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:59 GMT