http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5040 ------- Comment #2 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-10-25 16:46 ------- The reference proposal covers part of the question raised by this bug, but not all. The remaining question is: If an SML reference is unresolved (that is, sml:ref="true", sml:nilref="false", no target), then - Should targetElement be satisfied or violated - Should targetType be satisfied or violated For completeness, what we did decide: Acyclic targetRequired targetElement targetType Non-reference Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Satisfied Null Satisfied Violated Satisfied Satisfied Unresolved Satisfied Violated ? ? Resolved Check Satisfied Check CheckReceived on Thursday, 25 October 2007 16:47:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:59 GMT