W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Tracking editor action items

From: Wilson, Kirk D <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:18:08 -0400
Message-ID: <F9576E62032243419E097FED5F0E75F30152B990@USILMS12.ca.com>
To: "Smith, Virginia \(HP Software\)" <virginia.smith@hp.com>, <public-sml@w3.org>

I believe the Action items fall into three categories: (1) Actions to
open Bugzilla issues, (2) Editorial actions, and (3) Others,
miscellaneous actions perhaps directed at a particular person.

Does the current proposal address only group (2) or is it intended to
address (2) and (3) thereby requiring that every action eventually show
up in Bugzilla?

Also, is the expected procedure that the scribe will regard an action
item with [EDITORS], as demonstrated in Sandy's latest minutes, and the
Editors will take the action of entering the issue into Bugzilla?

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Architect, Development
CA Labs / IP&S
603 823-7146
 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Smith, Virginia (HP Software)
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 5:40 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: Tracking editor action items


The SML editor team would like to track all our action items in Bugzilla
for the following reasons:

- We would like to keep all issues in one place rather than having both
bugs and action items.
- Bugzilla is easier for tracking since we can reassign owners and keep
track of status and priority in Bugzilla. 

This means that the editors will move all (past and future) editor
action items into Bugzilla.

The intent of this email is just to verify with the working group that
this process is ok. Does anyone have any problems with this?

--
ginny
Received on Sunday, 24 June 2007 00:18:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:53 GMT