W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > December 2007

[Bug 4774] definitional schema documents should be preferentially used over all other sources when validating instances

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:54:05 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1J2sG5-0001yW-CP@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4774





------- Comment #17 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2007-12-13 17:54 -------
Summary of points that may need WG discussion.

>From comment #9:

2.  In section 4.4, for "schema-incomplete". "A required schema is not included
..." Maybe it's more accurate to say "Some required schema documents *may* not
be included ...".

---------------
3.  In the following paragraph "... distinguish between these two cases and
that is not always ...". Suggest to change "and" to "because".

--------------
12.  It's not clear to me whether "namespaceBindingType" should also allow
extension points using wildcards.

-------------
15.  Maybe it's helpful to have a default value for "schemaComplete":
    <xs:attribute name="schemaComplete" type="xs:boolean"/> becomes
    <xs:attribute name="schemaComplete" type="xs:boolean" default="true"/>

(Really meant for the default to be "false".)

----------
And from comment #14

[1]
I believe that the following 2 points from comment# 6 should apply even when a
consumer ignores the <schemaBindings> element.

6 schemaLocation on <include> and <redefined> are resolved using aliases
7 xsi:schemaLocation attributes and schemaLocation on <import> elements are
ignored

----------
[2]
I am not sure I understand the sentence (from section 5.4.2 Bindings defined)
below:

"Although SML-IF itself does not do so, various uses of SML-IF MAY choose to
extend the sets of documents involved in bindings to include documents not
contained in the interchange set."

----------
[3] Consumers that ignore the <schemaBindings> element:
The spec clearly defines the behavior when consumers choose to use the
<schemaBindings> element. The spec should also define the behavior when a
consumer ignores the <schemaBindings> element.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2007 17:54:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:08 UTC