W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > December 2007

[Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme?

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:15:48 +0000
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1J0O4S-0001wX-MD@wiggum.w3.org>


------- Comment #10 from kirk.wilson@ca.com  2007-12-06 21:15 -------
Decision on teleconference of 12/6/2007: move EPR scheme to a W3C Note.  This
requires several changes to the current text of the SML and SML-IF
specifications.  These places are:

SML spec:  Introductory paragraph of section 4.2 refers to the EPR scheme as
one of "the two" schemes defined in the specification.

SML spec: content of section 4.2.2 needs to completely deleted.  Suggestion:
this would be an appropriate place to discuss the SML "extension mechanism" for
defining additional schemes.  For example, to identify the "categories" of
schemes that are identified in SML-IF section 5.3.3 (ignoring the
schemaLocation but including non-URI schemes).

SML spec: Appendix D.  There is example code that contains an example of an EPR
scheme that should deleted, and there is text following that example that
discusses having two scheme in one reference.  That text needs to be deleted.

SML-IF spec: The only place the EPR scheme is mentioned is in section 5.3.3,
where it is given as an example of category 3 URI reference.  The text will
have to be generalized or perhaps the the EPR scheme as a potential type of
such a category.
Received on Thursday, 6 December 2007 21:15:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:08 UTC