W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-sml@w3.org > December 2007

[Bug 4675] add text in section 5.3.3 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:27:27 +0000
CC:
To: public-sml@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1J01mB-0002At-OM@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675





------- Comment #18 from virginia.smith@hp.com  2007-12-05 21:27 -------
I don't think we should have 2 levels of compliance for SML-IF documents. This
does not help with regard to interoperability which is SML-IF's primary goal.
Rather, this dilutes the interoperability that SML-IF brings to the table.

I propose the following 2 changes:

=================
5.1 Conformance Criteria

A conforming SML-IF Document MUST adhere to this specification as described in
the normative sections. 

A conforming SML-IF Producer MUST be able to generate a conforming SML-IF
Document from an SML model.

A conforming SML-IF Consumer MUST process a conforming SML-IF Document using,
in whole or part, semantics defined by this specification. It is OPTIONAL that
a conforming SML-IF Consumer process all elements defined in this
specification, but any element that is processed MUST be processed in a manner
that is consistent with the semantics defined here. 



================ 
Add new section - insert after section 5.2

5.3 SML References

An SML reference can contain multiple representations using different reference
schemes. SML-IF requires that all non-null SML references in the interchange
set MUST contain an SML URI scheme [SML 1.1] representation. Any SML reference
MAY also include other scheme representations as well.
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2007 21:27:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:56:08 UTC