http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #9 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-12-04 15:08 ------- If I have <myref> <sml:uri>#abc(xyz)</sml:uri> </myref> Then it's clear that it doesn't satisfy the syntax. But it's not clear what's the consequence: is <myref> not recognized as an instance of the URI scheme, or should it be an error? I think the latter is intended, in which case the new bullet 4 in section 4.3.1 can benefit from a "MUST". e.g. something like: Content of the sml:uri element MUST be valid with respect to the xs:anyURI type and it's normalized value MUST satisfy the following syntax ...Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2007 15:08:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:01 GMT