Re: [RE: Agenda for Silver meeting of 23 July 2019]

Jake,

Good question! From the Silver Requirements
<https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/>, I think we have this
described as clearly as we currently can in these particular sections:

   - Design principle
   <https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/#design-principles> 3: Be
   flexible enough to support the needs of people with disabilities and keep
   up with emerging technologies. The information structure allows guidance to
   be added or removed.
   - Requirement 4: Technology Neutral
   <https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/#technology-neutral>
   Guidance should be expressed in generic terms so that they may apply to
   more than one platform or technology. The intent of technology-neutral
   wording is to provide the opportunity to apply the core guidelines to
   current and emerging technology, even if specific technical advice doesn't
   yet exist.
   - Requirement 8: Scope
   <https://w3c.github.io/silver/requirements/#scope-0>
   The guidelines provide guidance for people and organizations that
   produce digital assets and technology of varying size and complexity. Our
   intent is to provide guidance for a diverse group of stakeholders including
   content creators, browsers, authoring tools, assistive technologies, and
   more.

Hope that helps!

-Shawn

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:10 AM Abma, J.D. (Jake) <Jake.Abma@ing.com> wrote:

>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have a general question about the scope of Silver which is not clear,
> also see different views / understanding on this:
>
>
> *"Is Silver only for Web content or will it take on all technologies /
> content out there in the wild, and if the scope is broader, is this even
> possible from within the W3C?"*
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jake
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Abma, J.D. (Jake)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:57 PM
> *To:* Jeanne Spellman; Jeanne Spellman; 'Shawn Lauriat'; Silver TF
> *Subject:* Re: [RE: Agenda for Silver meeting of 23 July 2019]
>
>
>
> A late thank you Jeanne! (with a vacation in between...)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jeanne Spellman <js@tetralogical.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 28, 2019 7:52 PM
> *To:* Jeanne Spellman; Abma, J.D. (Jake); 'Shawn Lauriat'; Silver TF
> *Subject:* [RE: Agenda for Silver meeting of 23 July 2019]
>
>
> Jake,
>
> I appreciate that you and many others need a summary of the different
> conformance proposals.  We are trying to get a summary of all the proposals
> organized now.  All the basic proposals are linked on the SIlver wiki in
> the Conformance section
> <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/silver/wiki/Main_Page#Silver_Conformance>.
>
>
> We have asked everyone to write up the pros, cons, risks, and holes
> (missing elements) for each proposal so we can consolidate them into
> coherent documents that anyone can read.  I want those documents to capture
> the essential points of all the email threads.  Many members of the group
> -- including active participants like myself -- cannot read and follow the
> long email threads and need to have the essential issues and arguments
> summarized in an organized fashion.
>
> I will send out a general email to the list when those documents are
> posted.
>
> jeanne
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ATTENTION:
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and only meant for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, don't use or disclose it in any way. Please let the sender know and delete the message immediately.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>