Re: Question on value based constraints

Hi!have you tried combining sh:xone with two sh:and constraints?e.g. something along the lines of:sh:xone (   sh:and (        ex:hasAddress sh:datatype xsd:string        ex:addrType sh:hasValue "simple"   )   sh:and (        ex:hasAddress sh:class ex:complexAddr        ex:addrType sh:hasValue "comolex"   ))(I'm on mobile right now so just pseudocode)br simon
-------- Original message --------From: Felix Sasaki <felix@sasakiatcf.com> Date: 4/17/19  18:26  (GMT+01:00) To: public-shacl@w3.org Subject: Question on value based constraints HI all,I have a question on how to model alternative constraints based on literal values.Let's assume the two alternatives ways to express an address:ALTERNATIVE 1:ex:person1 ex:hasAddress "Street xzy plz 12345 ..."ex:person1 ex:addressType "simpleAddress".ALTERNATIVE 2:ex:person1 ex:hasAddress ex:someComplexAddress1 # object is an instance of class ex:complexAddressex:person1 ex:addressType "complexAddress".I want to define two alternative shapes for addresses: one is simple, i.e. the literal value "Street xzy plz 12345 ...", and one is complex, i.e. an instance of ex:complexAddress.How do I model the choice between the two address' shapes based on the values "simpleAddress" vs. "complexAddress"?Regards,Felix