W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-ui@w3.org > June 2009

Re: state of the art

From: Tim rdf <timrdf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:30:54 -0400
Message-ID: <80995bcd0906261530u267fc6f0o9e86576ef3df86f0@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leo Sauermann <leo.sauermann@dfki.de>
Cc: paola.dimaio@gmail.com, Andreas Harth <andreas.harth@deri.org>, public-semweb-ui@w3.org
Leo,

I am very much interested in the objectives you outline and would like to
contribute. I will follow the additions to the wiki.

I created two Twines for Semantic Web Usability a while ago, but have not
found anyone interested in the topic. Please feel free to tuck things there
as well -- perhaps we could get some critical mass. Within a twine, we can
comment on each artifact we post.

http://www.twine.com/twine/116nk1j23-c11/semantic-web-user-interfaces

http://www.twine.com/twine/116nlm5b5-c21/semantic-web-user-interaction

Regards,
Tim Lebo



> I like the idea of a collection of state-of-the-art, and will contribute,
> but only if I can edit myself and am sure that the state-of-the-art will be
> there the next years in public domain.
> The place where I am sure that it will remain open, and which is already
> the place where all other discussions about the Semantic Web happen, is the
> ESW wiki.
> I added a page here for you:
>  http://esw.w3.org/topic/SemanticWebUsability
>



>
> Rather, take exsiting tools and compare them against the vision -
>  can your grandma find a doctor in her neighbourhood that will accept her
> Health Insurance and treat her illness?
> (This was the guiding example of "The Semantic Web", 2001, Timbl et al)
> so - can facetted browisng help?
> can xy help?
>
> etc.
>
> best
> Leo
>
> I would also humbly suggest to look at the usability concerns that are
> addressed in KDE 4.0, which has an RDF based metadata layer.
> In our NEPOMUK project we are currently working on the biggest deployment
> of Semantic Web technology (especially RDF) ever, reaching half of all linux
> users... much usability to study there.
>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 11:52:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 29 June 2009 11:52:33 GMT