W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-ui@w3.org > November 2007

Re: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond

From: Duane Degler <ddegler@ipgems.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:53:07 +0000
Message-ID: <186566106-1196452412-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-708117814-@bxe008.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
To: emmanuelle@sidar.org, paola.dimaio@gmail.com, public-semweb-ui@w3.org
The idea if a SIG sounds interesting, and brings the subject into the main conference programme.

Hopefully you remain interested in submitting a paper to the workshop - we look forward to a lively discussion and interesting examples! Still 2 weeks to submit (due on Dec 14th). Of course, you can always submit early. ;-)

Sorry I missed what sounds like good discussions at ISWC07. See you at CHI. 

Duane Degler 

Co-organizer SWUI at CHI

Sent via BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo <emmanuelle@sidar.org>

Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:18:35 
Subject: RE: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond

Hi Paola and all,

Sorry for the delay in my response. I was in another city again :(

I'm reading now your proposal and I will answer to you in some minutes :-)

See you..


-----Mensaje original-----
De: paola.dimaio@gmail.com [mailto:paola.dimaio@gmail.com] 
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de noviembre de 2007 9:53
Para: paola.dimaio@gmail.com; public-semweb-ui@w3.org
Asunto: Fwd: SIG at CHI Florence/collective submission and beyond

Greets all

I am circulating this email to all who expressed an interest in a possible
IG either remotely on the W3C list or in person in Busan. It was great to
meet you all.

Following Tom Heath's suggestion, I have started a draft for submission of
SIG at CHI Florence, it can take up to 10 authors and 4 pages. I have then
realised there is an open call for papers here

Emmanuelle, shall we work on a paper, or is the idea of a SIG still worth

In order to start an incubator at W3C it is necessary to have three sponsor
members (I dont belong to any organisation officially, although I work
informally with a few members).

 Some of you suggested an IG is formed, I would encourage the pusual of this
 Let me now if you need my input anywhere along the line.

Either way, I am would like to see an 'open'  workgroup, as suggested on the
main W3C list,  to collectively work on furthering this area of research,
which appears in need to be studied further and in depth, as it briefly
surfaced at our lunchtime meeting in Busan

I have a few deliverables in mind and I am starting some jobs in this
direction in the forthcoming weeks with different people. Please share your
ideas for collaboration beyond the IG proposal

I am happy to use the existing wiki and mailing list for this and other
possible developments,



 provided there is a clear and explicit and consensual IP policy (still
waiting for a reply on that one , Avi and Max!). Not sure what is the
situation there but I need to preserve copyright  of my work for research
and other purposes (although I happy to collaborate and share, I  retain
commercial rights over my contributions), In other projects I share
copyright with contributors  based on effort, either equal or proportional
terms, depending on agreement.

Should the IP issue not be addressed satisfactorily by the existing
resources, and alternatively, or in addition to them, we can start
additional resources/collaborative workspaces to develop joint

Look forward to your ideas an input on how to proceed next Please let us all
know what you think and plans for cooperation


Paola Di Maio

Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 19:54:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:52 UTC