W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > May 2015

Re: New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

From: Marc Twagirumukiza <marc.twagirumukiza@agfa.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:00:12 +0200
To: amallia@edmondsci.com
Cc: "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF56875315.6D20015D-ONC1257E4A.0030DEE0-C1257E4A.00317524@agfa.com>
Hi Tony,

Thanks sharing this new version. I was wondering if we should always add 
f.eg on page 26-27-28:

.coding [ 
        fhir:Coding.system [fhir:value “http://example.org/local”

^^xsd:string  ] ; 
        fhir:Coding.code [fhir:value "admin"^^xsd:string  ] ; 
        fhir:Coding.display [fhir:value "Admin"^^xsd:string  ] ; 

If we do that in all places we will be compliant with the fixed 
requirements :

Kind Regards,

Marc Twagirumukiza | Agfa HealthCare
Senior Clinical Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research



Click on link to read important disclaimer: 

From:   Anthony Mallia <amallia@edmondsci.com>
To:     "its@lists.hl7.org" <its@lists.HL7.org>, w3c semweb HCLS 
Date:   19/05/2015 02:45
Subject:        New side by side FHIR RDF comparison

I have posted the new version

To see all the current stored versions you can go to 

This next version shows terminology binding in a fusion between the 
approaches of Grahame and Lloyd.
It brings the singleton instance of the Terminology class right into 
Coding/code and it solves the blank node problem there.
There is also some change to the fhir:Reference approach to simplify it 
and some initial work on Profile showing ValueSet constraints.

Tony Mallia

Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2015 09:00:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 19 May 2015 09:00:38 UTC