I'm fine with text links. I don't think the scope should be limited to
Pharmacy. We can start with them, but I don't think the project is
complete until this process is integrated into the FHIR build tooling and
has been rolled out across all relevant FHIR resources and profiles.
(Though, we could say that the roll-out simply falls within the scope of
the various WG's "develop and maintain" projects.)
In terms of tooling to support generation, the links themselves will still
need to be captured in the Excel spreadsheets used to author resources and
I doubt that a stand-alone tool to author individual mappings will be
terribly feasible. So on the tooling side, I think we'll be looking at
adjusting the build process in order to be able to validate the mappings
that are asserted in the Excel spreadsheets in whatever syntax we decide is
most feasible.
*Lloyd McKenzie*, P.Eng.
Senior Consultant, Information Technology Services
Gevity Consulting Inc.
E: lmckenzie@gevityinc.com
M: +1 587-334-1110 <1-587-334-1110>
W: gevityinc.com
*GEVITY**Informatics for a healthier world *
CONFIDENTIALITY – This communication is confidential and for the exclusive
use of its intended recipients. If you have received this communication by
error, please notify the sender and delete the message without copying or
disclosing it*.*
NOTE: Unless explicitly stated otherwise, the opinions and positions
expressed in this e-mail do not necessarily reflect those of my employer,
my clients nor the organizations with whom I hold governance positions
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:14 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
> Apparently the version that I sent is in a format that gets blocked for
> security. Try the attached version instead. I hope this one can be opened.
>
> Thanks,
> David Booth
>
>
> On 06/23/2015 04:25 PM, David Booth wrote:
>
>> Attached is a slightly revised draft PSS, as edited on today's HL7/W3C
>> RDF call. Some key things to check:
>>
>> - There was some discussion that this project might be more
>> appropriately owned by the FHIR Infrastructure group, and co-sponsored
>> by M&M and ITS, instead of being under ARB, though it is fine for it to
>> start under ARB.
>>
>> - We added some additional names to the Project Team: Grahame Grieve,
>> Lloyd McKenzie and Rob Hausam. Grahame was the only one whose name was
>> added without being present, so I took an action to check: Grahame, are
>> you okay with being listed as a Project Facilitator?
>>
>> - Section 3.b Project Need uses the phrase "text links". Lloyd, do
>> you think that phrasing is adequate as is, or would you suggest a
>> different phrasing? (Lloyd had to drop before we got to review that
>> part.)
>>
>> - In Section 3.g a Target Date of Jan 2016 is listed. There was some
>> question about whether that is too ambitious or should be left as a good
>> target.
>>
>> Unfortunately I neglected to turn on "track changes" before making
>> modifications, but hopefully you can run a comparison to see the
>> differences if necessary. The previous version is here:
>>
>> http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/arb_fhir_rim/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2FArB-computable%2520semantic%2520links%2520from%2520FHIR%2520-PSS.docx
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>> David Booth
>>
>