- From: Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@iscb.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:21:50 +0200
- To: Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Hi, I may re-use some bits of it, but overall I am dealing with quite a different thing. I don't have "publications", I have evolving information sets. Provenance/evidence and the like are there, but not so fine-grained (e.g.: I may have the whole ontology with the same provenance/evidence, not a few statement). In same case (small subset) I have some more fine-grained information. In this case I may pickup something from nanopubs, though I have a string focus on capturing evolution of knowledge rather than "facts" (e.g.: some facts gets validated). There is also an are I don't know how to fit in, from the nanopubs point of view, because facts come with a history of discussion behind. Another aspect that I think it's different is, whatever I have, it's id centric, and entity centric in the specific (like a dictionary). So identifiers (and the relations between identifiers and identifiers of versions) comes first. best, Andrea Il giorno 19/set/2014, alle ore 20:07, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com> ha scritto: > Hi, > I suggest nanopublications to track versioning for assertions > http://www.nanopub.org/guidelines/ > > m. > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On 19 September 2014 09:45, Andrea Splendiani <andrea.splendiani@iscb.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> When a concept change meaning, it changes id ;) >> >> Aha! I think it might not always change ID! ;) >> >> Best wishes, >> >> Kim
Received on Sunday, 21 September 2014 10:22:23 UTC