- From: Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 11:14:54 -0400
- To: Alasdair J G Gray <Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAtgn=S06D=dhGweO-svF+SAScC46roqKT1GKPuOq0jURyjzfQ@mail.gmail.com>
That makes sense, then. Jim On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Alasdair J G Gray < Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On 10 Sep 2013, at 16:02, Jim McCusker <mccusj@rpi.edu> wrote: > > I think Jerven's point is that it's unclear why having additional > properties would warrant an error or a warning, when this is actually a > good thing. > > > I agree and understand your point. What I was meaning was that it would be > flagged in someway that additional properties were provided; in order to be > informative. > > The way the validator is designed, it will return: > > - Error messages for properties that MUST be there and which are not > present. > - Warning messages for properties that SHOULD be there and which are > not present. > - Information messages for other properties that are detected. > > Given the use of properties that MAY be present, we (Manchester) will need > to revisit this design decision. However my first goal will be to get a > validator up that generates the above messages. > > Alasdair > > > Jim > > > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Alasdair J G Gray < > Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > >> Jerven, hello. >> >> I should have stated in the notes yesterday that the current validator is >> not complete. (I'm afraid I've been too busy to be able to complete this >> part of the work.) >> >> On 9 Sep 2013, at 17:43, Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Thanks for starting up again, and sorry for missing this. >> >> I had a quick question about the validator. Currently it seems to fail if >> a resource has an unknown type such as foaf:Organization . >> Is this correct? or is my dyslexia getting the better of me? >> >> >> However, I do not think that you should have received an error; perhaps a >> warning saying that additional properties were provided. >> >> Once I've completed the validator, it would be good to re-test your file >> and see what should be the appropriate output in this case. >> >> Regards, >> >> Alasdair >> >> >> Regards, >> Jerven >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Alasdair J G Gray < >> Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Attached are the notes that I took during the call today. >>> >>> Speak to you all next week. >>> >>> Alasdair >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dr Alasdair J G Gray >>> Research Associate >>> Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk >>> >>> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ >>> >>> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Jerven Bolleman >> me@jerven.eu >> >> >> Dr Alasdair J G Gray >> Research Associate >> Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk >> >> http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ >> >> Please consider the environment before printing this email. >> >> > > > -- > Jim McCusker > > Data Scientist > 5AM Solutions > jmccusker@5amsolutions.com > http://5amsolutions.com > > PhD Student > Tetherless World Constellation > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute > mccusj@cs.rpi.edu > http://tw.rpi.edu > > > Dr Alasdair J G Gray > Research Associate > Alasdair.Gray@manchester.ac.uk > > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~graya/ > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > -- Jim McCusker Data Scientist 5AM Solutions jmccusker@5amsolutions.com http://5amsolutions.com PhD Student Tetherless World Constellation Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute mccusj@cs.rpi.edu http://tw.rpi.edu
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2013 15:15:42 UTC