Re: Properties table

Okay, that was what I thought. I guess for the W3C note it makes sense to
have a strong rule set.

Alasdair, will the validator highlight properties that should be removed in
order to fit a certain profile? Not sure how easy/hard it would be to
implement though.

Joachim


On 28 November 2013 13:53, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>wrote:

> The reason for this is that we want to distinguish each of these forms,
> and allowing users to add any of these special attributes would undermine
> and confuse the process.
>
> m.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Joachim Baran <joachim.baran@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 26 November 2013 09:33, Gray, Alasdair J G <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>wrote:
>>
>>> [...] I have also used NEVER to indicate when a property should not be
>>> associated with a description profile.
>>>
>>   NEVER seems quite a strong indication. For example, if I have a catalog
>> description and additionally include dct:creator besides the MUST and
>> SHOULD properties, does the description become invalid then? Would "MAY"
>> not be appropriate here?
>>
>> Joachim
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michel Dumontier
> Associate Professor of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford
> University
> Chair, W3C Semantic Web for Health Care and the Life Sciences Interest
> Group
> http://dumontierlab.com
>

Received on Thursday, 28 November 2013 19:33:33 UTC