W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal Exchange Language of Healthcare

From: Michael Miller <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 07:25:06 -0800
Message-ID: <eccf7175b130f55f58717467f86cce11@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>, Conor Dowling <conor-dowling@caregraf.com>, Rafael Richards <rmrich5@gmail.com>
hi all,

i thought the comment was nicely put together.

"Reflect reasonableness/feasibility of products or organizational
capacity"

in this section near the end, and also, earlier, where it mentions that
other representations of data can be converted to RDF, it might be good to
point out that this allows organizations the opportunity to keep the data
in the way they want internally and convert to/from RDF on import/export.

cheers,
michael

Michael Miller
Software Engineer
Institute for Systems Biology


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joanne Luciano [mailto:jluciano@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:41 AM
> To: David Booth
> Cc: public-semweb-lifesci; Michel Dumontier; Conor Dowling; Rafael
Richards
> Subject: Re: Opening Walled Gardens: RDF / Linked Data as the Universal
> Exchange Language of Healthcare
>
> Thanks for doing this.
> Joanne
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:21 AM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:
>
> > FYI, here is the comment that Rafael, Michel, Conor and I submitted to
> > the US government Office of the National Coordinator for Health
> > Information Technology, in response to their RFC on "Meaningful Use"
> > requirements, proposing RDF / Linked Data as a universal exchange
> > language of healthcare:
> > http://dbooth.org/2013/mu/MU-Stage3-RFC-Simple-Response.pdf
> >
> > Although it is too late to change that submitted comment (as the
> > deadline was last night), we would still appreciate any feedback or
> > suggestions for improvement, as I'm sure we will have to make these
> > arguments and explanations many more times in the future.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > --
> > David Booth, Ph.D.
> > http://dbooth.org/
> >
> > Loss of web prodigy Aaron Swartz: http://tinyurl.com/ahe2k8c
> >
> > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not
necessarily
> > reflect those of his employer.
> >
> >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2013 15:25:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:17 GMT