W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Nature Publishing Group Linked Data Platform

From: Hammond, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:14:59 +0100
To: Jim McCusker <james.mccusker@yale.edu>
CC: Jerven Bolleman <me@jerven.eu>, <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CBB5CE63.396E0%t.hammond@nature.com>
Hi Jim:

Indeed DOIšs are dereferencable. And in fact we do make use of this ­ see
our Sample query #2 below.

Cheers,

Tony


==
select * 
where { 
  ?article a npg:Article ; npg:hasContributor ?contributor .
  ?contributor owl:sameAs ?crossref .
} 
limit 25
==

<http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.89>
<http://ns.nature.com/contributors/sara-lindstrom-3ic5xja3yjjka>
<http://id.crossref.org/contributor/sara-lindstrom-3ic5xja3yjjka> .
etc.


On 19/04/2012 14:07, "Jim McCusker" <james.mccusker@yale.edu> wrote:

> Recently I found out that doi.org <http://doi.org>  URIs are actually
> dereferenceable as RDF:
> 
> http://inkdroid.org/journal/2011/04/25/dois-as-linked-data/
> 
> I'm a year behind the curve on this, but I hadn't heard about this from
> anyone.
> 
> This might be another good point of integration for NPG Linked Data.
> 
> Jim
> 
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Hammond, Tony <t.hammond@nature.com> wrote:
>> Thanks, Jerven.
>> 
>> That would make more sense. Will wait to see if therešs more feedback, but
>> otherwise canšt see any reason why we shouldnšt change to use the NCBI links
>> instead.
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 19/04/2012 13:45, "Jerven Bolleman" <me@jerven.eu <http://me@jerven.eu> >
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Tony,
>>> 
>>> Last time I asked the NCBI help desk they preferred the use of
>>> "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15618302" instead of going via
>>> pubmed.org <http://pubmed.org>  <http://pubmed.org> .
>>> Let us know which you settle on and I will add owl:sameAs links from the
>>> uniprot.org <http://uniprot.org>  <http://uniprot.org>  RDF as well.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Jerven
>>> 
>> 
>> *****************************************************************************
>> ***   
>> DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who
>> is
>> not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in
>> error
>> please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage
>> mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept
>> liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not
>> expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its
>> agents.
>> Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents
>> accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or
>> its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and
>> attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan
>> Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan
>> Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number
>> 785998 
>> Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS 
>> *****************************************************************************
>> ***
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 19 April 2012 13:15:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:07 GMT