W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2011

RE: data quality

From: Mead, Charlie (NIH/NCI) [C] <meadch@mail.nih.gov>
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 23:15:36 -0400
To: Bob Futrelle <bob.futrelle@gmail.com>, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com>
CC: w3c semweb hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4D241B2CAA657641A30147AA5BF6AE782844DAFEDE@NIHMLBX07.nih.gov>
Shouldn't rules - and tools/standards to support them, e.g. SPIN?? - be part of this discussion as well?

From: Bob Futrelle [mailto:bob.futrelle@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 16:04
To: Michel Dumontier
Cc: w3c semweb hcls
Subject: Re: data quality

Provenance doesn't appear to get much attention at SemWebQuality.org.
It's more complex than just some notes about origins.

http://openprovenance.org/

- Bob Futrelle

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Michel Dumontier <michel.dumontier@gmail.com<mailto:michel.dumontier@gmail.com>> wrote:
Ran across this site on semantic web data quality (even includes an ontology):

http://semwebquality.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=SemWebQuality.org

Cheers!

m.

--
Michel Dumontier
Associate Professor of Bioinformatics
Carleton University
http://dumontierlab.com
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 03:16:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:03 GMT