W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2011

Next LODD call (W3C note on RDF practices for HCLS)

From: M. Scott Marshall <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 15:12:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CACHzV2MRZH06neGbMvxSO7UbWF5ZbfpgEMm4VKEf-S11sF4SpQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: linkedlifedatapracticesnote@googlegroups.com, HCLS <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
The next LODD teleconference would normally have been today. I have a
conflict so I didn't announce. If folks still want to call in, please
go ahead and discuss the W3C note. Richard Boyce has given us the seed
material by transforming the submitted article into a Google Doc and
now people are discussing how to approach the W3C note.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XzdsjCfPylcyOoNtDfAgz15HwRdCD-0e0ixh21_U0y0/edit?hl=en_US

Regardless of whether you decide to call in today, please take the
time to add comments to the above doc. If you want There is an ongoing
discussion about whether to put the technical material up front (as it
was in our original submission) or leave it like it is.

Cheers,
Scott

mikel.egana.aranguren
9:52 AM Sep 30
It seems to me that this structure (Case studies and then questions)
is not appropriate for an W3C note, I would do it the other way
around. Someone with more experience w.r.t W3C notes should say

mscottmarshall
10:01 AM Sep 30
Ironic - we originally wrote the article in that order but a reviewer
suggested that we change it around. :)

helenadeus
10:32 AM Oct 3
Agree with Mikel (despite opinions of reviewers) ... someone reading a
paper is looking for a nice intro and then the technical stuff;
someone reading a w3c note, on the other hand, wants the technical
stuff right away so that they avoid wasting time reading things they
already know are important




-- 
M. Scott Marshall
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 13:13:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:03 GMT