W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Fwd: Mikel W3C note

From: M. Scott Marshall <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:03:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CACHzV2NeLkec70S_TRyJS8WpfVa73k_Lvj1=XEr-CVJ9eRwbEA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
Cc: rdb20@pitt.edu, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Thanks for the tip David.

The permanent URL will come when we've created the W3 note. :) The current
projected timeline is to convert to HTML in December and request comments
before then (comments are already welcome).

Thanks,
Scott

On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 5:55 PM, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote:

> Regarding
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2011Nov/att-0013/EPMLSDtoRDF-Revision-V12-for-practice-note_Mikel.doc
>
> Nice work!  Another tool for converting between XML and RDF that should
> be mentioned is Gloze:
>
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.88.8929&rep=rep1&type=pdf
> Gloze was developed by Steve Battle as part of the Jena project, and is
> available from the Jena site:
> http://openjena.org/contrib/contributions.html
>
> BTW, does this "Mapping and linking life sciences data using RDF"
> document have any more permanent URL yet?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 11:13 -0500, Richard Boyce wrote:
> > FYI for LODD folks working on the RDF practice note. --R
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> >                           Subject:
> > Mikel W3C note
> >                              Date:
> > Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:19:53 -0500
> >                              From:
> > Mikel Egaņa Aranguren
> > <mikel.egana.aranguren@gmail.com>
> >                                To:
> > Boyce, Richard David
> > <rdb20@pitt.edu>
> >                                CC:
> > M. Scott Marshall
> > <mscottmarshall@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > Hi;
> >
> > Find attached a new version.
> >
> > I have added one of the tools in the first question and I have created
> > a new question for the rest of the tools. The rationale for this is
> > that, reading the first question, it seems to me that the emphasis
> > goes in RDB2RDF tools, and the tools for non-RDB2RDF seem like
> > secondary. If we like this new question I can refactor the document
> > (Rest of questions and table) after tomorrow's meeting. Also, I have
> > added a citation to Mendeley LODD marked as Yeganeh 2011 in the
> > document. Richard, I hope you can add it.
> >
> > I have also extended and rewritten Q13 and made small changes in some
> > places to improve consistency and readability.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Mikel
> >
> > PS: tomorrow call is at 17:00 CET?
> >
> > --
> > Mikel Egaņa Aranguren, Ph.D.
> >
> > http://mikeleganaaranguren.com
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> David Booth, Ph.D.
> http://dbooth.org/
>
> Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> reflect those of his employer.
>
>
>


-- 
M. Scott Marshall
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 17:04:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:01:04 GMT