- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 13:14:11 -0400
- To: Matthias Samwald <samwald@gmx.at>
- Cc: Tim Clark <twclark@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 16:43 +0200, Matthias Samwald wrote: > I agree with Tim's ideas. The different task forces should be > problem-focused. This would also help to reduce the redundancy between > task forces (for example, the original idea of BioRDF was mainly to > convert biomedical data to RDF, but over the years this also became a > major focus of other task forces such as LODD). Another question that EricP raised during the call: redundancy between task forces is one thing, and it's best to avoid, but tie-in between task forces is a different thing. To what extent should the task forces be linked? For example, should we try, from the outset, to link them together into something cohesive? Or should they be largely independent, cross-fertilizing opportunistically? -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 17:14:34 UTC