W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2011

Re: triple store recommendation

From: Helena Deus <helenadeus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:08:04 +0100
Message-Id: <E7D9C12A-C55A-462C-B17F-E4A88D81A46C@gmail.com>
Cc: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, "public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: Paul Rigor <paul.rigor@uci.edu>
Hi Paul, 
I am using owlim on top of sesame, which is great if you are   Planning to use inference in the sparql query.

Sent from my phone

On 14 Jun 2011, at 17:54, Paul Rigor <paul.rigor@uci.edu> wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> Thank you for the great tips!
> 
> All the best,
> Paul
> 
> --
> Paul Rigor
> http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> In my experience, most concurrent triple stores perform fairly comparably well for queries. However, if you do plan to load a huge amount of RDF data into your triple, say more than 10 million, then I would suggest you get a powerful computer first.
> 
> A 64-bit computer with >15GB memory should give you some reasonable performance. And you can also play with some disk partition.
> 
> I wrote some notes a while back, benchmarked on Jena TDB:
> 
> http://code.google.com/p/open-biomed/wiki/BenchmarkLoadingFlyBaseEC2XLarge
> 
> Hope it can be helpful to you.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Jun
> 
> 
> On 14/06/11 16:05, M. Scott Marshall wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> There was a paper comparing query performance presented at SWAT4LS in
> Berlin 2010 by Vladimir Mironov (CC'd).
> 
> Within HCLS, many triplestores have been used. It depends on the purpose
> and your preferences for features. The HCLS KB is in Virtuoso and
> Allegrograph. We've also worked with Sesame and OWLIM. NCBO uses Mulgara
> for their SPARQL endpoint. The nice thing about many of the triplestores
> is that if you decide to use another one, migrating your data isn't much
> work so you're not locked in.
> 
> Cheers,
> Scott
> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Michael Miller
> <Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org
> <mailto:Michael.Miller@systemsbiology.org>> wrote:
> 
>    hi paul,
> 
>    i did a little research on this a little while ago.  you should have
>    plenty of power.
> 
>    if you're research i hear oracle offers their spatial triple store
>    for free, running jena on top of a storage system like BigOWLIMis
>    also quite popular
> 
>    check out Berlin SPARQL benchmark
>    (http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/index.html)
> 
>    cheers,
> 
>    michael
> 
>    *From:*public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>    <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>
>    [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org
>    <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org>] *On Behalf Of *Paul Rigor
>    *Sent:* Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:03 AM
>    *To:* public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org <mailto:public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
> 
>    *Subject:* triple store recommendation
> 
>    Hi all,
> 
>    It was fun joining the conference call yesterday; very enlightening.
> 
>    I'm looking into setting up my own triplestore (for the first
>    time!). I was wondering if you'd have recommendations on which
>    storage backend I could use. I'll be deploying the triplestore on an
>    okay machine (quad intel xeon X5570 with 48GB, 400GB on striped SAS
>    disks).
> 
>    Thanks,
>    Paul
> 
>    --
> 
>    Paul Rigor
> 
>    http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor <http://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Eprigor>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> M. Scott Marshall, W3C HCLS IG co-chair, http://www.w3.org/blog/hcls
> http://staff.science.uva.nl/~marshall
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 17:09:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:47 UTC