Re: An Universal Exchange Language

Totally kidding, Mark.  I guess my "sense of humor" is a bit too dry.  


On Dec 14, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Mark wrote:

> Well... I defer to you on the richness... I am merely an "adherent" to the originally proposed technology... it was you and your collaborators who invented it!!
> 
> Just pay me a salary for evangelism ;-)
> 
> M
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:55:07 -0800, Tim Clark <twclark@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> 
>> I think we are qualified and should apply for the $ - we could make a YouTube video of our application and send it in. People could learn something - and we might get rich.
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Mark <markw@illuminae.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> But seriously, Tim, if we were to pursue this problem, we would need some form of unambiguous identifier for "things"... and given the distributed nature of the biomedical domain, we'd want to make sure that there was some way of resolving that identifier to obtain metadata about it from a variety of disparate sources who might have very different information - clinical, molecular, demographic, etc...
>>> 
>>> hmmmm....
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3316 - Release Date: 12/14/10
>> 
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2010 11:29:00 UTC