Matthias Samwald wrote: > I have also started to convert SIDER into aTags, but our two > conversions will be complementary. What I am doing is mapping the > information to the OBO disease ontology and to DBpedia (for drug > names), and reusing OBO and DBpedia URIs directly. The conversion will > be lossy when no matches are found in these resources, but it will be > bound more tightly to OBO and DBpedia. > > The STITCH ids for chemicals seem to be equivalent to Pubchem in all > cases I checked. Are there deviations? I wonder if there are any cross-references between STITCH and the TCM dataset that Jun converted. -KeiReceived on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 02:42:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 May 2009 02:42:18 GMT