W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2009

RE: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ?

From: andrea splendiani \(RRes-Roth\) <andrea.splendiani@bbsrc.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:17:39 -0000
Message-ID: <C20D81024E1CAE4893D45B58FA0FFF6401101054@rothe2ksrv1.rothamsted.bbsrc.ac.uk>
To: "Chris Mungall" <cjm@berkeleybop.org>
Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
Thanks!

It'2 240M, but compressed is only 9. 
I wonder whether there is some architecture to transparently transfer
compressed ontologies...

Ciao,
Andrea

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Mungall [mailto:cjm@berkeleybop.org] 
Sent: 25 February 2009 20:53
To: andrea splendiani (RRes-Roth)
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls
Subject: Re: Is there an NCBI taxonomy in OWL ?


On Feb 25, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Andrea Splendiani wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was looking for an NCBI Taxnomoy in OWL, but I didn't find it (or  
> better, could find fragment from other projects...)
>
> What is strange though, is that on the obo foundry website  
> (berkeleybop.org/ontologies) there are notes on the ncbi taxonomy  
> representation in owl... but not the representation itself.

Temporarily dropped from the summary page but still available at the  
usual URL
http://purl.org/obo/owl/NCBITaxon

(warning: large..)

> Does anybody have some hint about where I can fin an OWL version ?  
> Or even an RDF version ? Even better would a sparql endpoint  
> containing it...
>
> best,
> Andrea Splendiani
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 00:18:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:54 GMT