W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > February 2008

RE: SDTM mapping Pt1 data - [COI] Clinical Observations Interoperability

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:52:38 -0500
Message-ID: <DBA3C02EAD0DC14BBB667C345EE2D12401E2AFD8@PHSXMB20.partners.org>
To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, "Rachel Richesson" <Rachel.Richesson@epi.usf.edu>, <public-hcls-coi@w3.org>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
There have been several pointers on our threads to good works on Eligibility
Criteria and rule representation that should be reviewed. Additionally, both
Vipul's requirements documents and my early work on the use case clearly show
that Eligibility Criteria fall into several vocabulary domains (medications,
diagnoses, procedures, etc.) Perhaps, to simplify this project for demonstration
purposes, we could consider using these domains + vocabulary, and not a formal
information model, for the Eligibility Criteria?
[VK] I think we are using different terms to talk about the same thing...?
Medications, Diagnoses, Procedures, etc. in my mind are a description of paitent

The following have been uploaded to the COI Wiki:
Collection of Lab Observation Models:
Collection of Medication Models:
Collection of Models for Signs, Symptoms and Diagnoses:
Collection of Models for Physical Examination:

The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only
for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other
use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and
properly dispose of this information.
Received on Tuesday, 26 February 2008 15:53:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:35 UTC