W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > October 2007

Re: what would change for me?

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:20:54 -0400
Message-Id: <13371B1A-444F-43B8-B1AE-5753B30FE0E5@creativecommons.org>
Cc: "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, p.roe@qut.edu.au, j.hogan@qut.edu.au
To: lotus@ieee.org

On Oct 23, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Marc-Alexandre Nolin wrote:

> Currently, I'm waiting for the publication of Jonathan URI
> recommendation to add it to the Bio2RDF system. Adding the support to
> the standardization effort doesn't mean to throw away the previous
> working system :)
>
> Marc-Alexandre

I appreciate your confidence!  I am hoping to release a draft of the  
URI note to HCLS at the end of this week. It would be extremely  
helpful to me if you would give your advice on common names for  
public database records.  I think you have seen the science commons  
proposal, and your comments on that would be interesting. I have a  
"major issue" page on this topic:
   http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG_BioRDF_Subgroup/Tasks/ 
URI_Best_Practices/Recommendations/PublicResources

Since yours is the only other careful effort I know of along these  
lines, I'd be interested to know whether you recommend what you have  
for HCLS purposes, and what would be required to reconcile bio2rdf  
with purl.org/commons (besides finishing the implementation of the  
latter by making it yield RDF). I'm particularly interested in  
opinions on what goes between the // and the first /.

Jonathan
Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 16:17:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:50 GMT