W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2007

Re: bams class style model

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:15:57 -0400
Message-Id: <ACD40038-5450-4395-B23D-17F5360675E9@gmail.com>
Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: John Barkley <jbarkley@nist.gov>

Hi John,

Great progress!

I think I would choose a single name and then have e.g,  id and  
abbreviation be properties of it. You can use annotation properties  
for these. Then remove the "by" layer of the ontology - these lists  
can be regenerate on demand via e.g. a sparql query.

I notice that you use has_part and part_of in the definitions.  
Remember that each is a all-some statement, so perhaps verify that  
that is true. e.g. a has_part some b = every a has some b as a part.  
a part_of some b = every a is part of some b. Sometimes only one or  
the other direction is true.

Speak to you soon,


On Mar 19, 2007, at 8:18 AM, John Barkley wrote:

> For another one of my action items, I put on the wiki demo page:
> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/HCLSIG_DemoHomePage_HCLSIG_Demo
> a reference to the initial bams class style model and an updated  
> bams instance
> style model. In both, I made the properties "has_source" and  
> "has_target"
> transitive. Please let me know if this is not correct.
> There are no instances in the class style model. It is in the style  
> of the
> Pizza tutorial
> (http://www.co-ode.org/resources/tutorials/ProtegeOWLTutorial.pdf).
> You may notice that the model is OWL Full, but that's only because  
> there is an
> annotation property "has_bams_URL". Reasoners generally ignore  
> annotation
> properties.
> jb
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 14:16:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:30 UTC