W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2007

RE: NeuronDB RDF and OWL

From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 22:29:59 -0400
Message-ID: <2BF18EC866AF0448816CDB62ADF653810660E9C5@PHSXMB11.partners.org>
To: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Cc: "public-semweb-lifesci hcls" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
 

It is quite material. Probably more important scientifically then all the rest.
No one will care what we do if we give them nonsense answers, and worse tell
them they are "sound and complete" :)

 

[VK] From the point of view of completeness/soundness of the algorithm it
doesn't matter...

Of course, scientifically it does... 

But there is an old adage: "Garbage in ... Garbage out ..."

 

---Vipul






The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Friday, 16 March 2007 02:30:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:38 GMT