W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > March 2007

Re: NeuronDB RDF and OWL

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:26:55 -0400
Message-Id: <6a0d5d0a4b57b3d71849da0e96650d7b@gmail.com>
Cc: public-semweb-lifesci hcls <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>
To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>

Just to clarify, because "sound and complete" is often used in a 
different sense: I don't mean sound and complete in the sense it is 
used in describing the properties of reasoning algorithms. I meant this 
statement with respect to the quality of answers to questions asked 
within our domain of interest: Biology/Life Sciences.  The former only 
depends on the algorithm. The latter depends on what's in our KB, and 
how we ask the questions.


On Mar 15, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote:

>> Put another way, the goal might be stated as wanting to get both
>> *all* available answers to our questions, and *only* correct answers
>> to our questions, and both the above contribute to achieving that 
>> goal.
> [VK] I agree. Our answers need to be sound and complete. The point is 
> whether
> richer modeling gets us closer to that goal?
Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 15:27:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:52:30 UTC