Just to clarify, because "sound and complete" is often used in a different sense: I don't mean sound and complete in the sense it is used in describing the properties of reasoning algorithms. I meant this statement with respect to the quality of answers to questions asked within our domain of interest: Biology/Life Sciences. The former only depends on the algorithm. The latter depends on what's in our KB, and how we ask the questions. -Alan On Mar 15, 2007, at 6:42 AM, Kashyap, Vipul wrote: >> Put another way, the goal might be stated as wanting to get both >> *all* available answers to our questions, and *only* correct answers >> to our questions, and both the above contribute to achieving that >> goal. > > [VK] I agree. Our answers need to be sound and complete. The point is > whether > richer modeling gets us closer to that goal?Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 15:27:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:38 GMT