samwald@gmx.at wrote: > After a lot of thinking I have finally decided on the style for the > visualization. I chose a geographical metaphor, here is an example (with > arbitrary connections): > http://neuroweb.med.yale.edu/senselab/temporary_files/map-draft-2.png The metaphor is clearly flawed, or else surely UniProt would be depicted in the center :-) You state that "if two ontologies are mapped in a separate mapping file, there should be a direct connection between both". Does a simple HTTP-based resolver count as a "mapping file"? Also, a resource such as UniProt, while focussed on proteins, has various ontologies that are not restricted to proteins, how to represent that?Received on Saturday, 23 June 2007 13:42:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:41 GMT