W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2007

Re: BioRDF Telcon

From: Marc-Alexandre Nolin <lotus@ieee.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:21:16 -0400
Message-ID: <d6a9bb0d0706190821j43c907bah44d67aa9dbbb6e5f@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org

Hi,

About this Banff Manifesto, me and Francois Belleau wanted to give a
base of discussion with this text. The purpose of it, is to give some
simple rule where, when you followed them, URI will connect together
without having the added work to rewrite every URI before using them.

For everybody to be able to place comment on it, the last version is
in a wiki at
http://bio2rdf.org/JSPWiki/Wiki.jsp?page=BanffManifesto

In this same wiki, we are currently making a follow up of the article
we present in Banff and explaining every normalization and decision we
took about URI for our system to work. We welcome every comments.

Marc-Alexandre Nolin

2007/6/18, Kei Cheung <kei.cheung@yale.edu>:
>
> Hi Jonathan et al.,
>
> Eric may add to it, but I just want to describe briefly what I know. At
> the Banff HCLS-DI Workshop
> (http://neuroweb.med.yale.edu/hcls/Welcome.htm), a number of authors had
> presented their work involving their own URI convention/format. As a
> result, there was a proposal called "Banff Manifesto"
> (http://docs.google.com/View?docid=ddm4nhwq_41cpz6kq). There was a
> follow-up meeting at Banff right after the HCLS demo that Eric and
> others might be able to tell people more about it (I wasn't at the
> follow-up meeting).
>
> Best,
>
> -Kei
>
> Jonathan Rees wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 6/11/07, *Eric Neumann* <eneumann@teranode.com
> > <mailto:eneumann@teranode.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     +1 !
> >
> >     I've also added a reference to the Banff discussion on URI's. I
> >     plan to put this also on the agenda for the next HCLSIG TC (June 21).
> >
> >     -Eric
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks, but for the benefit of those of us who weren't at this
> > dicussion in Banff, could you summarize what transpired, or  give a
> > link to minutes?
> >
>
>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:21:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:48 GMT