W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org > June 2007

RE: Clinical semantics and coverage in OBI / OBO - was Re: HCLS SW "Web Metro Map"

From: Ogbuji, Chimezie <OGBUJIC@ccf.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:41:07 -0400
Message-ID: <2702D0EBA4F0A749968E52E8644184EA2887D5@CCHSCLEXMB59.cc.ad.cchs.net>
To: "Kashyap, Vipul" <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>, samwald@gmx.at
cc: kei.cheung@yale.edu, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, Kerstin.L.Forsberg@astrazeneca.com
BTW, I've since moved that terminology mapping document (I had some problems within IE while it was attached to the Wiki).  It now lives at:
 
http://purl.org/cpr/mapping
I'll update the BFOProcess Wiki with some thoughts on process usecases motivated by clinical research data.
Chimezie (chee-meh) Ogbuji
Lead Systems Analyst
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
9500 Euclid Avenue/ W26
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Office: (216)444-8593
ogbujic@ccf.org

________________________________

From: Kashyap, Vipul [mailto:VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG]
Sent: Tue 6/5/2007 10:36 PM
To: Ogbuji, Chimezie; samwald@gmx.at
Cc: kei.cheung@yale.edu; public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org; Kerstin.L.Forsberg@astrazeneca.com
Subject: RE: Clinical semantics and coverage in OBI / OBO - was Re: HCLS SW "Web Metro Map"




> Theoretically, it should mostly be a matter of names not semantics.
> At the top-most levels there seems to be a strong correspondence.
> Since, the POMR ontology only uses a handful of DOLCE terms, I'll take
>  a stab at trying to find equivalence in OBI / BFO.  This way, we can
> easily determine where these foundations do not account for the kind of
> semantics you need for clinical data (such as diagnostic actions, their
> interpretations, etc.).

[VK] I am not sure whether I would agree on this. Some times conceptualizations
can differ widely, for example the notion of a process across different domains.
It is much more than a matter of naming.

Interestingly this was triggered by your definition of process location which I
did not like (since I was viewing it from the perspective of a computational
process).

I was wondering if you could try to find the correspondence in the context of a
use case probably involving process. For example, how about the following:

(A) Define the notion of disease as a biological process using BFO and DOLCE
primitives.
(B) Define the notion of disease as a clinical care process using BFO and DOLCE
primitives.

This will help create bridges across the HCLS domains? As posted earlier, the
wiki page is at:

http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/BFOProcessDefinitionDiscussion

Cheers,

---Vipul





The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.





===================================




Cleveland Clinic is ranked one of the top 3 hospitals in
America by U.S.News & World Report. Visit us online at
http://www.clevelandclinic.org for a complete listing of
our services, staff and locations.


Confidentiality Note:  This message is intended for use
only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
law.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error,  please
contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in
its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy.  Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 20:44:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:00:48 GMT