- From: Khalid Belhajjame <Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:46:56 +0100
- To: "'Matthias Samwald'" <samwald@gmx.at>, <Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch>, "'M. Scott Marshall'" <marshall@science.uva.nl>
- Cc: "'Alan Ruttenberg'" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, <wangxiao@musc.edu>, "'Michel_Dumontier'" <Michel_Dumontier@carleton.ca>, "'public-semweb-lifesci'" <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, "'Mark Wilkinson'" <markw@illuminae.com>, "'Benjamin Good'" <goodb@interchange.ubc.ca>, "'Natalia Villanueva Rosales'" <naty.vr@gmail.com>
I am not sure whether the following issue has already been discussed. By using the identifiers to also locate where the RDFs statements describing the resource in question are, don’t we somehow dictate where the document(s) containing the RDFs statements describing a given resource are to be located? -----Original Message----- From: public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org [mailto:public-semweb-lifesci-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Samwald Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:13 PM To: Eric.Jain@isb-sib.ch; M. Scott Marshall Cc: Alan Ruttenberg; wangxiao@musc.edu; Michel_Dumontier; public-semweb-lifesci; Mark Wilkinson; Benjamin Good; Natalia Villanueva Rosales Subject: Re: Immunity of SW statements to changes in location - data integration use case > The main discussion at the moment is how much of > a benefit there is in having a PURL for a specific representation > such as the web page for P12345, in addition to the PURL for the > "biothing" P12345. I think the benefit would be immense. I have seen so much confusion arising in Semantic Web projects that try to do it the 'smart' way and lump both together. The slightly increased complexity of the implementation is nothing compared to the long-term costs caused by this confusion and the associated barriers to interoperability. - Matthias
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 14:04:55 UTC